8.5.12

Venezuela pone a funcionar una red de farmacias populares con precios hasta un 40% más bajos

 
En el acto de inauguración de uno de los centros farmacéuticos en Caracas, los ministros de Alimentación, Carlos Osorio; y de Salud, Eugenia Sader, informaron que los establecimientos inician sus operaciones este lunes.

La red venezolana de farmacias populares “Farmapatria” inició operaciones este lunes con 172 establecimientos distribuidos en todo el país, que permitirá un ahorro de entre un 34 y un 40 por ciento a la ciudadanía, informaron fuentes oficiales.




Osorio ejemplicó que “un medicamento de Insuficiencia Cardíaca e Hipertensión Leve en un sistema capitalista tiene un costo de 105 bolívares (24,42 dólares), mientras que en la Red de Farmapatria tendrá un precio de 70 bolívares (16,28 dólares)”, divulgó la agencia estatal AVN.

El ministro de Alimentación, Carlos Osorio, dijo que estas farmacias buscan frenar la especulación y permiten al pueblo venezolano tener acceso a los medicamentos de manera continua, estable y a un precio justo.

Explicó que Farmapatria está estructurada en cuatro etapas. La primera, iniciando este lunes, consiste en un plan de capacitación con la incorporación de 172 jóvenes que van estar en cada uno de los establecimientos, en el contexto de la Misión Saber y Trabajo, los cuales se van a especializar en un Sistema Integral de Control de Medicamentos en los estados donde se ubiquen las farmacias.
La segunda corresponde a la implementación (creación de la estructura), la tercera la consolidación progresiva y la cuarta la expansión de la red de farmacias.

Por su parte, la ministra de Salud, Eugenia Sader, explicó que se tendrán tres tipos de establecimientos; a saber, Farmapatria número 1, para aquellos locales de entre 10 y 30 metros, que distribuirán medicamentos que no requieren récipes para su compra y estará atendido por un auxiliar de farmacia.

La tipo 2 contará con más de 100 metros cuadrados, donde no sólo se distribuirán medicamentos, sino que tendrán acceso a vacunas gratuitas, terapias, orientaciones farmacéuticas y equipos médicos.

Comentó que a Farmapatria se integraron las 32 Fundafarmacias que existen en el país, 5 instalaciones del Ministerio de Comercio, 42 farmacias del MinSalud y 96 centros que pertenecen al Ministerio de Alimentación, tales como Pdval (Productora y Distribuidora Venezolana de Alimentos), Mercal (Mercado de Alimentación), Boticas Populares.

Actualmente, las Farmapatria estarán ubicadas en 15 estados del país, gracias a una alianza estratégica entre FundaFarmacia, Cámara Venezolana de Medicamentos y la Cámara de la Industria Farmacéutica. También, participan en este proyecto los Ministerios de Ciencia y Tecnología, Salud, Comercio y Alimentación.

RNV / AVN / Telesur


Venezuela pone a funcionar una red de farmacias populares con precios hasta un 40% más bajos

Chávez regresa a Venezuela para "noquear" a la oposición en las urnas – RT


El presidente de Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, ha anunciado que regresará en los próximos días a Caracas tras culminar su tratamiento contra el cáncer en La Habana para incorporarse a la pugna electoral de las presidenciales del 7 de octubre.

"Ya en la recta final del tratamiento, en los próximos días debo estar de retorno con el favor de Dios para incorporarme progresivamente a la primera línea de batalla", comentó Chávez en una breve conexión telefónica con el canal del Estado.
El líder bolivariano dijo que "la oposición no volverá a ganar en Venezuela". "Vamos a trabajar muy duro y le vamos a dar un nocaut fulminante", sentenció.

En relación a la victoria en las presidenciales en Francia del socialista François Hollande frente al conservador Nicolas Sorkozy, Chávez comentó que Francia sale de un "gobierno terrible" que -dijo- estuvo "subordinado al imperio yanqui", y manifestó su deseo de retomar las relaciones con ese país.

Chávez permanece en Cuba desde hace una semana para concluir el tratamiento de radioterapia que le fue prescrito después de que el 26 de febrero pasado fuese operado de un segundo tumor canceroso en el área de la pelvis, recurrencia del cáncer que lo llevó al quirófano inicialmente en junio del año pasado.




Chávez regresa a Venezuela para "noquear" a la oposición en las urnas – RT

6.5.12

Medvedev leaves behind legacy of reform — RT

Dmitry Medvedev’s time in the Kremlin may go down in the history books as a period when Russia began to make serious strides in the fight against corruption, and changes in law that introduced colorful diversity into the nation's political life.

Although Medvedev is widely recognized for declaring war on Russian corruption, his first task as president brought him face-to-face with a conflict of the bloody sort.

Just three months into Medvedev’s presidency, on the morning of August 8, 2008, Russia awoke to the news that Georgia had launched a large-scale military offensive against South Ossetia in a desperate bid to claim the territory. The attack caused casualties among civilians and Russian peacekeepers stationed in the capital, Tskhinval.

What followed next were five days of intense fighting, with Russian forces pushing deep into Georgian territory. Eventually, Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili agreed to a ceasefire, which Moscow signed on August 16. Ten days later, Medvedev signed a decree officially recognizing the sovereignty of South Ossetia and nearby Abkhazia.

Although Russia was viciously attacked on the Western media front during the duration of the conflict, an EU independent commission report found that
Georgia, not Russia, was really to blame for starting the hostilities.

Pushing the reset button


Although the South Ossetian conflict placed severe strains on Russia-US relations, outgoing President Medvedev and his American counterpart, Barack Obama, nevertheless found the political will to activate the button on their “reset” plans.

In March 2009, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton presented Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov with a mock-up "reset button" to symbolize improved bilateral relations. The little red button, however, quickly became the butt of jokes as the word "reset" was mistranslated into the Russian for “overcharge”. Ironically, however,  “overcharged” has come to more accurately describe the state of Russia-US relations in light of recent developments. But more on that later.

In April 2010, the reset bore its first fruit in the form of a New START treaty, which limited each side to 1,500 nuclear warheads. The only thing that could possibly derail the bilateral bonhomie was if the United States and Russia failed to cooperate on the construction of the US missile defense system in Eastern Europe. Unfortunately, that is exactly the course the reset is taking today.



Missile defense crash and burn


Looking back on the New START treaty, it may seem almost sinister that the Obama administration spoke of slashing nuclear warheads at the very same time it was building a missile defense system in Eastern Europe. Trading away some nuclear missiles while constructing a massive shield to hide under did not fool anybody, least of all the Medvedev administration.

As Russian military experts recently warned, the US-built system has the potential for making Russia’s remaining stockpile totally irrelevant. Unless the talks produce some tangible results, Russia will be forced to walk away from New START, possibly prompting another arms race in the process.

There is even the possibility that Russia will consider the risk of initiating a preemptive strike on the missile defense system. Russian General Chief of Staff Nikolay Makarov announced last week at a missile defense conference in Moscow that Russia may be forced into such a position if the situation continues to deteriorate.

“Considering the destabilizing nature of the (American) ABM system, namely the creation of the illusion of inflicting a disarming (nuclear) strike with impunity, a decision on preemptive deployment of assault weapons could be taken when the situation becomes more difficult,” Makarov said.

Meanwhile, Medvedev warned the US and NATO on many occasions over the course of his last two years in office that without an agreement on missile defense, the world would face the prospect of another arms race.

"I am not satisfied with the American side's reaction to my proposals and with NATO's reaction in general,” the Russian leader told reporters at the G-8 Summit in Deauville, France last year. “Why? Because we are wasting time. Even though I spoke about the year 2020 yesterday as a deadline…which is the year when the construction of a four-stage system of the so-called adaptive approach ends."



Political reform


In an effort to inject more political diversity into Russia’s political system, as well as appease the demands from a chorus of critics, Medvedev signed into law a bill to simplify Russia's current stringent requirements for the registration of political parties.

"The Justice Ministry should not be seen as a barrier – as participants in a previous discussion called it – but as a filter to do away with irregularities," Medvedev said during a meeting with some 40 leaders of unregistered parties in Moscow.

The ministry has in the past refused to register opposition parties, often on technicalities that the political opposition believes unfairly denies them a political voice.

The bill, which was passed both houses of parliament, reduces the membership requirement for registering a party to 500 people from the present 45,000. It also eliminates the requirement for parties to collect voter signatures in order to participate in elections.

The outgoing President also signed a much-anticipated law on the direct election of governors.

“This law now enters into force and from now on heads of regions in this country will be elected by direct secret voting of all citizens living on the territory of the region,” Medvedev announced during a meeting with leaders of the State Duma parties.

Finally, in what could also be described as political reform, Medvedev passed a decree for the creation of a Public Television channel in Russia, which is scheduled to air on January 1, 2013.

“Of course, the state has influence on everything, but such influence must not be exorbitant,” Medvedev observed.



Battling corruption


"Corruption has become a systemic problem, and we therefore need a systemic response to deal with it," – Dmitry Medvedev, May 19, 2008.
Although external factors may eventually undo Medvedev’s reset efforts with the United States, nothing will be able to take away his sweeping efforts to eliminate corruption in Russia.

One of Medvedev’s first acts as president was the signing of a law obliging officials, including the prime minister, deputy prime ministers and ministers, to report not only their own incomes, but also those of their family members. Medvedev did not exclude himself and his family from following the new legislation.

Medvedev continued his battle against corruption up till the very end of his presidential term. In March, he submitted to the State Duma a bill that aims to control civil servants’ expenditures, telling the parliamentary majority he wanted it discussed and approved as soon as possible.

“I am asking you to pay special attention to this bill so that it is worked through and made effective before being approved,” the outgoing President told lawmakers.

Medvedev’s new draft law obliges all civil servants to declare not only their incomes, but also large expenditures. It requires that state officials report the expenditures of their spouses and children if the expenditures involved acquisitions of land, vehicles or securities. Finally, the bill would require that all documents pertaining to the acquisitions were received legally.

Although Russia still has a long way to go before corruption is a thing of the past and the country conforms to the “rule of law.” Nevertheless, Medvedev’s strenuous efforts have put the country on the right path.



Modernization and reform


In addition to fighting corruption, Dmitry Medvedev has shown himself to be a tech-savvy politician. He embraced the endless capabilities of the internet, reaching out to his constituents via a variety of social media, which includes a personal blog and Twitter account. He even instituted a program that allowed him to watch in real-time how government bureaucrats were carrying out their orders.

“I want it installed on my own computer, so that I can see at the click of a button, what is happening with the decree, who is responsible for the delay, and what should be done with the culprit,” he told reporters in October, 2010.

Meanwhile, reform initiatives are not relegated to the halls of government.
The urgent need for police reform was accentuated the January 24, 2011 bombing at Domodedovo International Airport, which killed 36 people and injured 193. The Russian leader slammed public safety issues at a “whole host of facilities” to make his case for broadening police powers “to ensure public safety.”


Military modernizer


Finally, Medvedev paved the way for radically streamlining the Russian military. Russia boasts the fourth-largest military in the world, with just over 1 million active personnel and 20 million reserve troops.

Following Medvedev’s orders, Makarov said the Russian military will eventually adopt a recruiting structure similar to those of NATO member states, slowly phasing out its conscript-based system in favor of recruiting contract troops.

"We will be moving further, towards a contract armed forces,” the General Chief of Staff said.

In conclusion, Medvedev’s one-term presidency, focused as it was on reform and modernization, provided a perfect balancing act to Putin’s emphasis on security and stability. Now, Putin will pick up where Medvedev left off, hopefully restoring the reset with the United States, as well as forging an agreement with the US and NATO over European missile defense.

In the absence of such crucial agreements, Russia will be forced to shift gears and look for new allies, predictably in the East. The United States and Europe now have an opportunity to meet Russia halfway in order to confront dire global problems, including terrorism and economic stagnation to name a few. It would be terribly unfortunate if this opportunity was missed at such a crucial juncture in history.

Robert Bridge, RT

Medvedev leaves behind legacy of reform — RT

3.5.12

"Overwhelming military-type response" - Oakland cops could face sanctions for OWS actions — RT

The city of Oakland, California has been issued an ultimatum by a federal judge: either figure out a way to handle the flood of complaints against the police or start being sanctioned.

District Judge Thelton Henderson has demanded that officials in the Bay Area city start determining this week how to deal with the abundance of accusatory statements filed with Oakland authorities, specifically citing the flood of complaints that have come in over how law enforcement conducted themselves during raids on the city’s Occupy Wall Street protests. In a decision made this week, Judge Henderson says that the Oakland Police Department must submit their proposal on how to handle the grievances within the next week or else be sanctioned by federal authorities.

Calling into question the police department’s documented mishandling of protesters demonstrating there under the OWS umbrella, Judge Henderson says that cops have time and time again resorted to "an overwhelming military-type response" when conducting crowd control during a series of events in recent month that have become especially commonplace since the Occupy movement began last fall.

In October during the dawn of the Occupy protests, Iraq War veteran Scott Olsen suffered a fractured skull after being hit by a non-lethal projectile fired by Oakland police. The incident caused outrage across America among protesters and non-demonstrators alike, as well as other vets that felt degraded by the same country they took an oath to protect.

“I knew that I wasn’t the only person that felt that way,” Marine Jay C. Gentile explained to RT after hearing of Olsen’s injuries. “There are just honestly no words to express the bond that Marines feel for each other. This goes across the service, but it’s very specific for the Marines.”

Judge Henderson’s mandate also formally marks for the first time that an official force has deemed Olsen’s injury to stem directly from a law enforcement weapon. Only weeks after that incident, a fellow US vet, 32-year-old Kayvan Sabehgi, was checked into intensive care for a lacerated spleen injury he says he incurred at the hands of the Oakland PD.

"Then they lined up in front of me. I was talking to one of them, saying 'Why are you doing this?' when one moved forward and hit me in my arm and legs and back with his baton. Then three or four cops tackled me and arrested me,” Sabehgi told the Guardian a day after his arrest.

Oakland has been marred by violent encounters involving their police force since before the Occupy movement took hold, as well. The execution of an unarmed subway patron in 2009 spawned massive protests waged at both Oakland elected officials and the police department that deals with issues on the city’s BART — Bay Area Rapid Transit — system.

Now three years after Oscar Grant was shot and killed in cold blood on an Oakland train platform, Judge Henderson says that the city needs to take some serious steps to avoid federal intervention.

"It would be problematic enough if, as seems inevitable, (Oakland police's) compliance levels were to backslide as a result of their failure to address the Occupy Oakland complaints in a timely fashion," explains the judge. "Such failures would be further indication that, despite the changed leadership at the City of Oakland and its police department, (Oakland police) might still lack the will, capacity, or both to complete the reforms to which they so long ago agreed.”


"Overwhelming military-type response" - Oakland cops could face sanctions for OWS actions — RT

2.5.12

Pentagon encircles Iran: Victory would take 3 weeks — RT



As the US beefs up its military presence in the Persian Gulf region, Pentagon strategists estimate that they would need less than a month to defeat Iranian forces should a military conflict take place.

US Central Command (CENTCOM) believes it can destroy or significantly degrade Iran's conventional armed forces in about three weeks using air and sea strikes, a defense source told The Washington Post.

“We plan for any eventuality we can and provide options to the president,” Army Lt. Col. T.G. Taylor, a spokesman at CENTCOM told the newspaper. “We take our guidance from the secretary of defense and from our civilian bosses in [Washington] DC. So any kind of guidance they give us, that’s what we go off of [sic].”

The American military has been building up its presence in the region amid rising tension in the area.

The US Navy currently has two aircraft carriers deployed near Iran and is upgrading mine-detection and removal capabilities.

The US Air Force recently dispatched a number of F-22 Raptor strike fighters to a base in the United Arab Emirates. The move caused backlash from Tehran, which said Wednesday it threatened regional stability.

Deploying a “floating base” in the Persian Gulf – a converted transport ship that would serve as a semi-stationary base of operations for the US military – is also on the table. USS Ponce is expected to host mine-sweeping helicopters, speed boats and probably commando teams.

The Pentagon has also intensified training of elite troops of its allies in the region. The members of the Joint Special Operations Task Force-Gulf Cooperation Council commando team, who serve as instructors, may be ordered to go into the field as well, should such a need arise.

The measures are taken as contingency for possible attack by Iran on US troops or blocking of the Strait of Hormuz, the vital oil transit route, the US says.
CENTCOM says there are about 125,000 US troops in close proximity to Iran. The majority of them – 90,000 – are deployed in or around Afghanistan. Some 20,000 soldiers are ashore elsewhere in the Near East region; and a variable 15,000 to 20,000 serve on naval vessels.

Oil battlefront

The military threat is just part of the mounting pressure on Tehran. Washington says it would use force only as a measure of last resort and is instead focusing on economic pressure.

On Tuesday, US President Barack Obama signed an order giving the Treasury Department more power to impose financial sanctions against those trading with Iran.

"Treasury now has the capability to publicly identify foreign individuals and entities that have engaged in these evasive and deceptive activities, and generally bar access to the US financial and commercial systems," the department said in a statement.

The US and the EU have issued a ban on buying Iran-produced crude in a bid to cripple the country’s export-dependent economy. Part of this effort involves sanctions against companies and institutions engaged in the oil trade with Iran financially. They are banks transferring payment for the crude or firms insuring tankers transporting Iranian oil.

The Iranian oil industry is not suffering from sanctions alone. The country’s Oil Ministry reported last week that it had finally managed to contain a cyber attack on the industry’s facilities.

“The software attack has been fully contained and controlled with the help of experts three days after it was hit,” Iran’s deputy oil minister for engineering affairs, Hamdollah Mohammadnejad, told the state-run Mehr news agency.

In 2010 a malicious computer worm called Stuxnet damaged computer software at Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities. Some computer security experts said the malware was the work of a highly-professional hacker team, which was probably provided with know-how by US or Israeli governments.

Western countries and Israel suspect Iran of trying to build a nuclear bomb and are pressuring it to stop enrichment of uranium. Tehran insists it is pursuing a civilian nuclear power program only, which it is entitled to do as a sovereign state.

The row has escalated last year after the publication of a controversial report by UN’s nuclear watchdog, which Iran’s opponents used to justify issuing more sanctions.


Pentagon encircles Iran: Victory would take 3 weeks — RT

La Fundación Mozilla asegura que la Ley CISPA atenta contra su privacidad - Expansion.com


MADRID, 2 (Portaltic/EP)


La Fundación Mozilla ha asegurado que la recién aprobada Ley CISPA -Ley de Intercambio y Protección de Información de Inteligencia Cibernética- atenta contra su privacidad y concede "una inmunidad" a las empresas y el gobierno que son "demasiado amplias en torno al uso indebido de la información".

La ley CISPA fue aprobada el pasado jueves (noche del viernes en España) por la Cámara de Representantes de Estados Unidos. Esta ley es para muchos la sucesora de las polémicas leyes antipiratería SOPA y PIPA y se trata de una norma que daría facultades a las empresas privadas para compartir con el Gobierno datos privados de usuarios que sean sospechosos de promover o participar en ciberamenazas.

Esta ley permite que las empresas y el Gobierno pudiesen saltarse los requerimientos legales que actualmente se exigen para este tipo de prácticas. Ante ella, es posible encontrar opiniones a favor y en contra. Los actores a favor de esta ley defienden que su objetivo es mejorar la seguridad y apelan a la independencia de las empresas para facilitar los datos de los usuarios.

Por otro lado, los detractores de la norma aseguran que esta ley está confeccionada de forma ambigua para posibilitar su uso con fines distintos a los de detectar ciberamenazas, de forma que se podría utilizar como un mecanismo de control y represión para otras actividades de la Red. En este sentido, muchos consideran que CISPA vulneraría la libertad de Internet y la privacidad de los usuarios. Entre estos detractores se encuentra la Fundación Mozilla.

Según recoge la revista Forbes, la fundación asegura que la Ley CISPA atenta contra su privacidad e incluye "definiciones vagas" sobre la ciberseguridad. Aunque desde Mozilla apoyan la protección de Internet y que esta se convierta en una red más segura consideran que esta nueva ley "concede una inmunidad a las empresas y el gobierno que son demasiado amplias en torno al uso indebido de la información".

"Esperamos que el Senado se tome el tiempo necesario para examinar a fondo y abiertamente estos temas con la participación de los interesados antes de seguir adelante con esta legislación", aseguran desde la fundación.

Esta no sería la primera vez que Mozilla se posiciona en contra de una ley cuanto menos controvertida. El pasado mes de enero durante las protestas contra la Ley SOPA, Mozilla se unió a Reddit y Wikipedia en un "apagón" de sus sitios, en sustitución de su contenido con información acerca de SOPA y la violación de los derechos de libertad de expresión.


La Fundación Mozilla asegura que la Ley CISPA atenta contra su privacidad - Expansion.com

Firefox creators Mozilla attack Congress; denounce CISPA — RT

Silicon Valley’s Mozilla Corporation has tasked themselves with extinguishing a fire, and no, it’s not what you have in mind.
Mozilla, the Mountain View, California-based developers responsible for creating the hugely successful Firefox Web browser, has issued a statement publically condemning the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA. In a memo sent to Forbes’ data security department on late Tuesday, Mozilla’s privacy and public policy official explains that its newly-publicized stance is not one that encourages online cyber attacks, but merely establishes that the company is in favor of protecting the rights of its users.
“While we wholeheartedly support a more secure Internet, CISPA has a broad and alarming reach that goes far beyond Internet security,” reads the statement. “The bill infringes on our privacy, includes vague definitions of cybersecurity, and grants immunities to companies and government that are too broad around information misuse. We hope the Senate takes the time to fully and openly consider these issues with stakeholder input before moving forward with this legislation.”
Mozilla’s issues with CISPA mirror opposition that was voiced last week on Capitol Hill during debates over the legislation. Rep Jan Schakowsky (D Illinois) said the cybersecurity bill “still fails to adequately safeguard the privacy of Americans” and that the government needs to be able to “combat the serious threat of cyber attacks and still insure that we are protecting our computer systems and the civil liberties of Americans.”
Jared Polis, a Democratic rep for Colorado, issued similar concerns, stating, “CISPA represents a massive government overreach in the name of security” and that “Any America that values his or her privacy should be concerned.”
At this point, however, the US Senate is now the only Washington entity that stands between CISPA and the desk of President Barack Obama. In a hurried vote last Thursday, the US House of Representatives passed the bill in its current form much to the chagrin of lawmakers like Schakowsky and Polis, essentially leaving approval from the other side of Congress the only thing that the bill needs to be brought to the White House.
Advisers for President Obama have issued a statement on their own part insisting that the administration will recommend that the commander-in-chief vetoes the bill if it is brought to the Oval Office, although critics have already come out to call the move another example of election year pandering. The White House issued a similar statement last year regarding the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, or the NDAA. Originally the Obama administration said that the president had issues over the bill’s provisions regarding the indefinite detention of American citizens, although Obama eventually inked his name to the paper on New Year’s Eve.
This time around, condemnation is indeed present in regards to CISPA’s future, but Mozilla’s just-released memorandum could be a catalyst in bringing more critics out of the woodwork. Although opponents of CISPA have certainly come out against the bill for weeks now, Mozilla’s statement is among one of the first released by a major Internet entity. Other Silicon Valley giants such as IBM, Facebook and Microsoft still stand in favor of the bill. In recent days, it was reported that Microsoft switched stances and would formally oppose CISPA. This week, however, Digital Journal reports that a spokesperson for the company now confirms that the official Microsoft stance on CISPA is “unchanged,” returning Bill Gates’ billion-dollar corporation to the supportive side of CISPA.
That isn’t to say, of course, that widespread opposition of CISPA is far from rampant. In the recent days since CISPA’s passing, critics have continued to speak up against the act. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, presidential hopeful Ron Paul and the American Civil Liberties Union have all taken an anti-CISPA stance, as well as the popular web forum Reddit.


Firefox creators Mozilla attack Congress; denounce CISPA — RT